Agentbrisk

Augment Code vs Magic.dev

Two of the most-asked-about agents in the coding space. Here's how they actually stack up.

Augment Code

AI coding assistant built for million-line enterprise codebases

Free + $50/mo

Read full review →

Magic.dev

Frontier code model with a 100M-token context window, built for enterprise-scale software engineering

Enterprise

Read full review →

Side-by-side comparison

Augment Code Magic.dev
Tagline AI coding assistant built for million-line enterprise codebases Frontier code model with a 100M-token context window, built for enterprise-scale software engineering
Pricing Free + $50/mo Enterprise
Categories coding, vscode-extension, jetbrains, enterprise coding, agent, research
Made by Augment Code Magic.dev
Launched 2024-04 2023-06
Platforms macOS, Windows, Linux API
Status active beta

Augment Code highlights

  • + Deep context engine that indexes and reasons over million-line codebases
  • + VS Code and JetBrains IDE plugins with inline completions and chat
  • + Auggie CLI for agentic, multi-step coding tasks from the terminal
  • + SOC 2 Type II compliance with no training on customer code
  • + Pull request review and inline code chat integrated into the dev workflow

Magic.dev highlights

  • + 100 million token context window for whole-codebase reasoning
  • + Code-specialized frontier model trained specifically for software engineering
  • + Long-horizon task execution across large monorepos
  • + Enterprise private deployment options
  • + SWE-bench performance at frontier model level

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Augment Code or Magic.dev?
Neither is universally better. Augment Code (Free + $50/mo) leans into coding, while Magic.dev (Enterprise) is closer to coding. Pick based on which workflow you actually do every day.
What is the price difference between Augment Code and Magic.dev?
Augment Code is free + $50/mo. Magic.dev is enterprise. See the pricing row in the comparison table.
Can I use Augment Code and Magic.dev together?
In most cases, yes. They serve overlapping but distinct needs, so running them side by side is common until you decide which fits your workflow.
Search